日本語 English
| 開講年度/ Academic YearAcademic Year |
20262026 |
| 科目設置学部/ CollegeCollege |
社会学部/College of SociologyCollege of Sociology |
| 科目コード等/ Course CodeCourse Code |
DD464/DD464DD464 |
| テーマ・サブタイトル等/ Theme・SubtitleTheme・Subtitle |
ポスト自然の環境倫理 |
| 授業形態/ Class FormatClass Format |
対面(全回対面)/Face to face (all classes are face-to-face)Face to face (all classes are face-to-face) |
| 授業形態(補足事項)/ Class Format (Supplementary Items)Class Format (Supplementary Items) |
|
| 授業形式/ Class StyleCampus |
講義/LectureLecture |
| 校地/ CampusCampus |
池袋/IkebukuroIkebukuro |
| 学期/ SemesterSemester |
春学期/Spring SemesterSpring Semester |
| 曜日時限・教室/ DayPeriod・RoomDayPeriod・Room |
月1/Mon.1 Mon.1 ログインして教室を表示する(Log in to view the classrooms.) |
| 単位/ CreditsCredits |
22 |
| 科目ナンバリング/ Course NumberCourse Number |
CCS3310 |
| 使用言語/ LanguageLanguage |
日本語/JapaneseJapanese |
| 履修登録方法/ Class Registration MethodClass Registration Method |
科目コード登録/Course Code RegistrationCourse Code Registration |
| 配当年次/ Assigned YearAssigned Year |
配当年次は開講学部のR Guideに掲載している科目表で確認してください。配当年次は開講学部のR Guideに掲載している科目表で確認してください。 |
| 先修規定/ Prerequisite RegulationsPrerequisite Regulations |
|
| 他学部履修可否/ Acceptance of Other CollegesAcceptance of Other Colleges |
履修登録システムの『他学部・他研究科履修不許可科目一覧』で確認してください。 |
| 履修中止可否/ Course CancellationCourse Cancellation |
〇(履修中止可/ Eligible for cancellation) |
| オンライン授業60単位制限対象科目/ Online Classes Subject to 60-Credit Upper LimitOnline Classes Subject to 60-Credit Upper Limit |
|
| 学位授与方針との関連/ Relationship with Degree PolicyRelationship with Degree Policy |
各授業科目は、学部・研究科の定める学位授与方針(DP)や教育課程編成の方針(CP)に基づき、カリキュラム上に配置されています。詳細はカリキュラム・マップで確認することができます。 https://www.rikkyo.ac.jp/about/disclosure/educational_policy/sociology.html |
| 備考/ NotesNotes |
The objective of this course is to cultivate critical thinking skills that enable students to understand and critically examine why contemporary society is described as operating in a “post-nature” condition, what kinds of practical and exploratory efforts are currently being undertaken to rethink human–nature relations, and what challenges emerge in these processes. Building on this understanding, students will develop the capacity to experiment with and practice concrete, exploratory approaches to engaging with the reconfiguration of humanity and post-nature in contemporary society.
To achieve a sustainable society, we are often told that what we need is the capacity to design social systems that effectively manage and circulate resources, based on scientific knowledge and data, in order to secure the survival of individuals and communities. Such ideas about sustainability appear to be widely shared, as reflected in global frameworks such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Discussions surrounding climate change and climate justice have further intensified the urgency of this sense of “survival,” compelling us to act, while at the same time deepening our frustration over the lack of concrete means to address these challenges in our everyday lives.
Yet when we ask what a sustainable society would actually look like, or how our lives would unfold within it, we often find it surprisingly difficult to form a clear image. The stable and taken-for-granted notion of “nature” upon which our societies have long relied can no longer be assumed. We now live within a planetary system profoundly transformed by human activities—one characterized by unprecedented uncertainty. In such conditions, how can we generate reliability in the use and conservation of resources? Can conceptualized forms of “nature,” such as wilderness or satoyama (traditional socio-ecological landscapes in Japan), still function as guiding pillars? And how might we relate to new forms of “nature” or “life” produced through biotechnology in the pursuit of a sustainable society?
Moreover, when sustainability is framed as a matter of “survival,” how can justice be realized—both among those living today and across generations? What does it mean to be fair, and how might fairness be achieved? In a sustainable society, in what ways can we pursue the question of how to “live well”? At an even more fundamental level, what does the richness of human existence truly entail? Without adequately confronting these questions, the notion of a “sustainable society” often seems to move ahead of us, leaving our understanding behind.
This course engages with these questions by drawing on two closely related fields: environmental sociology and environmental ethics. Through these perspectives, we will explore ethical principles and practical approaches for imagining, engaging with, and responding to the new forms of life and nature emerging from scientific and technological developments. Precisely because these issues are urgent, this course emphasizes the importance of pausing to reflect. Through dialogue, critical thinking, and the exchange of ideas, we will begin by stopping, considering, and thinking together about how we might confront the challenges of sustainability in contemporary society.
| 1 | イントロダクション:なぜ「ポスト自然」なのか |
| 2 | 人新世:ディストピアとユートピアの狭間で |
| 3 | 「自然」を想像/創造する:野生、風土、複数の自然 |
| 4 | ポスト自然に「自然」をつくる:人と動物、新しい生命(1) |
| 5 | ポスト自然に「自然」をつくる:人と動物、新しい生命(2) |
| 6 | 自然をいなす:災害のあいだ |
| 7 | 自然を食べる:縁を結ぶ |
| 8 | 存在のサバイバル:気候正義 |
| 9 | 存在の不在:公害と被害論 |
| 10 | 存在の不可視化:環境正義 |
| 11 | 存在をつなぐ:地球Bと未来世代 |
| 12 | 存在を支える:ケアと労働 |
| 13 | 居場所をつくる:都市と限界集落 |
| 14 | 存在の豊かさを求めて |
板書 /Writing on the Board
スライド(パワーポイント等)の使用 /Slides (PowerPoint, etc.)
上記以外の視聴覚教材の使用 /Audiovisual Materials Other than Those Listed Above
個人発表 /Individual Presentations
グループ発表 /Group Presentations
ディスカッション・ディベート /Discussion/Debate
実技・実習・実験 /Practicum/Experiments/Practical Training
学内の教室外施設の利用 /Use of On-Campus Facilities Outside the Classroom
校外実習・フィールドワーク /Field Work
上記いずれも用いない予定 /None of the above
| 補足事項 (Supplementary Items) |
|---|
| コメントペーパー |
授業中にあげられた文献を読み、授業内容と合わせてコメントペーパーを書く
| 種類 (Kind) | 割合 (%) | 基準 (Criteria) |
|---|---|---|
| 平常点 (In-class Points) | 100 |
コメントペーパー(20%) 中間テスト(40%) 最終テスト(Final Test)(40%) |
| 備考 (Notes) | ||
なし/None
| その他 (Others) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 授業中に案内する |
この授業は、ポスト自然と人間の関わりが模索される現代社会において、なぜポスト自然と呼ばれるのか、いかなる模索が実際に為されているのか、その際にはどのような課題があるのかを理解したうえで、具体的な手探りの方法について考え、実践するための思考力を養うことを目的とする。
The objective of this course is to cultivate critical thinking skills that enable students to understand and critically examine why contemporary society is described as operating in a “post-nature” condition, what kinds of practical and exploratory efforts are currently being undertaken to rethink human–nature relations, and what challenges emerge in these processes. Building on this understanding, students will develop the capacity to experiment with and practice concrete, exploratory approaches to engaging with the reconfiguration of humanity and post-nature in contemporary society.
「持続可能な社会を実現するために、わたしたちが必要としているのは、個人あるいは集団の生き残りをかけて、科学的知識とデータをもとに、資源をうまく循環し管理する社会を設計することである。」こうした持続可能性に関する考えは、たとえばSDGsを眺めてみても、広く共有されているように思える。気候変動と気候正義をめぐる議論は、こうした「生き残り」にいよいよ切迫性をもたらし、何かに駆り立てられつつも、具体的な手立てが日常にないもどかしさも日々加速していく。
他方で、持続可能な社会とは具体的にはどのような社会なのか、その中でのわたしたちの生活はどのようなものになるのか考えてみると、意外にうまく思い描くことはできないのではないだろうか。わたしたちの社会は、これまで基盤としてきたゆるぎない「自然」によりかかることはもはやできない。わたしたちは、人間活動がもたらした未知の惑星システムに生きている。かつてなく不確実性を増した惑星システムのなかで、いかに資源利用と保全の確実性を生み出すか。野生や里山など概念化された「自然」はそのための柱となりうるのだろうか。持続可能な社会の実現のため、生命工学によって生み出される「自然」や「生命」と、どのような関わりをつくっていくことができるだろうか。
また、「生き残りをかける」といったときに、わたしたちの間で、そして未来世代との間で、公正さはどのように実現されるのだろうか。公正であるとはどのようなことを意味するのだろう。また、持続可能な社会において、わたしたちはどのような、そしてどのように「よりよく生きること」を追求できるのだろうか。そもそも、わたしたちの存在の豊かさとは何を意味するのだろう。こうした問いにうまく向き合えず、答えが探せないまま、持続可能な社会という言葉がわたしたちの先を歩いているようだ。
本講義では、こうした問いに取り組んできた二つの近接する分野、環境社会学と環境倫理学の議論を参照しながら、科学技術が生み出す新しい生命や自然と向き合うための、それらを想像し生み出すための倫理的指針や実践について探求する。喫緊の課題だからこそ、立ち止まって考えることも必要になる。講義ではそれぞれが思考をめぐらせ、言葉をやり取りすることを通じて、まずは各々が立ち止まることから始めてみたい。
To achieve a sustainable society, we are often told that what we need is the capacity to design social systems that effectively manage and circulate resources, based on scientific knowledge and data, in order to secure the survival of individuals and communities. Such ideas about sustainability appear to be widely shared, as reflected in global frameworks such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Discussions surrounding climate change and climate justice have further intensified the urgency of this sense of “survival,” compelling us to act, while at the same time deepening our frustration over the lack of concrete means to address these challenges in our everyday lives.
Yet when we ask what a sustainable society would actually look like, or how our lives would unfold within it, we often find it surprisingly difficult to form a clear image. The stable and taken-for-granted notion of “nature” upon which our societies have long relied can no longer be assumed. We now live within a planetary system profoundly transformed by human activities—one characterized by unprecedented uncertainty. In such conditions, how can we generate reliability in the use and conservation of resources? Can conceptualized forms of “nature,” such as wilderness or satoyama (traditional socio-ecological landscapes in Japan), still function as guiding pillars? And how might we relate to new forms of “nature” or “life” produced through biotechnology in the pursuit of a sustainable society?
Moreover, when sustainability is framed as a matter of “survival,” how can justice be realized—both among those living today and across generations? What does it mean to be fair, and how might fairness be achieved? In a sustainable society, in what ways can we pursue the question of how to “live well”? At an even more fundamental level, what does the richness of human existence truly entail? Without adequately confronting these questions, the notion of a “sustainable society” often seems to move ahead of us, leaving our understanding behind.
This course engages with these questions by drawing on two closely related fields: environmental sociology and environmental ethics. Through these perspectives, we will explore ethical principles and practical approaches for imagining, engaging with, and responding to the new forms of life and nature emerging from scientific and technological developments. Precisely because these issues are urgent, this course emphasizes the importance of pausing to reflect. Through dialogue, critical thinking, and the exchange of ideas, we will begin by stopping, considering, and thinking together about how we might confront the challenges of sustainability in contemporary society.
| 1 | イントロダクション:なぜ「ポスト自然」なのか |
| 2 | 人新世:ディストピアとユートピアの狭間で |
| 3 | 「自然」を想像/創造する:野生、風土、複数の自然 |
| 4 | ポスト自然に「自然」をつくる:人と動物、新しい生命(1) |
| 5 | ポスト自然に「自然」をつくる:人と動物、新しい生命(2) |
| 6 | 自然をいなす:災害のあいだ |
| 7 | 自然を食べる:縁を結ぶ |
| 8 | 存在のサバイバル:気候正義 |
| 9 | 存在の不在:公害と被害論 |
| 10 | 存在の不可視化:環境正義 |
| 11 | 存在をつなぐ:地球Bと未来世代 |
| 12 | 存在を支える:ケアと労働 |
| 13 | 居場所をつくる:都市と限界集落 |
| 14 | 存在の豊かさを求めて |
板書 /Writing on the Board
スライド(パワーポイント等)の使用 /Slides (PowerPoint, etc.)
上記以外の視聴覚教材の使用 /Audiovisual Materials Other than Those Listed Above
個人発表 /Individual Presentations
グループ発表 /Group Presentations
ディスカッション・ディベート /Discussion/Debate
実技・実習・実験 /Practicum/Experiments/Practical Training
学内の教室外施設の利用 /Use of On-Campus Facilities Outside the Classroom
校外実習・フィールドワーク /Field Work
上記いずれも用いない予定 /None of the above
| 補足事項 (Supplementary Items) |
|---|
| コメントペーパー |
授業中にあげられた文献を読み、授業内容と合わせてコメントペーパーを書く
| 種類 (Kind) | 割合 (%) | 基準 (Criteria) |
|---|---|---|
| 平常点 (In-class Points) | 100 |
コメントペーパー(20%) 中間テスト(40%) 最終テスト(Final Test)(40%) |
| 備考 (Notes) | ||
なし/None
| その他 (Others) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 授業中に案内する |