日本語 English
| 開講年度/ Academic YearAcademic Year |
20232023 |
| 科目設置学部/ CollegeCollege |
法学部/College of Law and PoliticsCollege of Law and Politics |
| 科目コード等/ Course CodeCourse Code |
EX606/EX606EX606 |
| テーマ・サブタイトル等/ Theme・SubtitleTheme・Subtitle |
AIが民法に与える影響 |
| 授業形態/ Class FormatClass Format |
対面（全回対面）/Face to face (all classes are face-to-face)Face to face (all classes are face-to-face) |
| 授業形態（補足事項）/ Class Format (Supplementary Items)Class Format (Supplementary Items) |
|
| 授業形式/ Class StyleCampus |
|
| 校地/ CampusCampus |
池袋/IkebukuroIkebukuro |
| 学期/ SemesterSemester |
秋学期/Fall semesterFall semester |
| 曜日時限・教室/ DayPeriod・RoomDayPeriod・Room |
水4･9205/Wed.4･9205 Wed.4･9205 |
| 単位/ CreditCredit |
22 |
| 科目ナンバリング/ Course NumberCourse Number |
LPX4910 |
| 使用言語/ LanguageLanguage |
日本語/JapaneseJapanese |
| 履修登録方法/ Class Registration MethodClass Registration Method |
科目コード登録/Course Code RegistrationCourse Code Registration |
| 配当年次/ Grade (Year) RequiredGrade (Year) Required |
配当年次は開講学部のR Guideに掲載している科目表で確認してください。配当年次は開講学部のR Guideに掲載している科目表で確認してください。 |
| 先修規定/ prerequisite regulationsprerequisite regulations |
|
| 他学部履修可否/ Acceptance of Other CollegesAcceptance of Other Colleges |
|
| 履修中止可否/ course cancellationcourse cancellation |
|
| オンライン授業60単位制限対象科目/ Online Classes Subject to 60-Credit Upper LimitOnline Classes Subject to 60-Credit Upper Limit |
|
| 学位授与方針との関連/ Relationship with Degree PolicyRelationship with Degree Policy |
|
| 備考/ NotesNotes |
その他登録 |
| テキスト用コード/ Text CodeText Code |
EX606 |
The objectives of this seminar are to examine the various problems in Civil Law while accurately understanding the positioning of those problems and to become able to derive your own ideas based on legal thinking. At the same time, this seminar aims to enable students to master the techniques which are required for learning and to become a member of society which include researching the literature, preparing as a group for a presentation and giving a report, and engaging in a debate based on a report.
In this seminar, we will examine the impact of AI on civil law.
Recent technological innovations in AI are remarkable How will these technological advances affect the world of law, especially the world of civil law? In the future, if AI acquires the ability to make decisions on its own and a situation arises in which the responsibility of the AI designer cannot be held, will AI itself be held responsible for the damage caused by AI? If we can, we need to give AI its status as a subject in the legal world. So, can AI be the subject of the legal world?
The task of this seminar is to struggle with various questions related to AI and civil law.
To answer these questions, we begin by studying basic legal precedents regarding privacy. After that, we will read related papers.
In December, we will invite Professor Céline Castets-Renard of the University of Ottawa, Canada, who is an expert in AI law, to give two classes (Hatano will serve as an interpreter).
In this seminar, during each session two or three students will present a report on the relevant topic which will form the basis of discussion (each participant will give one reports during the semester). Moreover, the students giving the report will also present the arguments after the report to lead the discussion (the instructor may assist as needed). The instructor wishes to respect the autonomy of all students. Students are required to sufficiently prepare and actively speak up in discussion.
In addition, this seminar is scheduled to be a joint seminar with Professor Aya Osawa (Hosei University). In addition to preparing a report, you are invited to participate in either the question or the answer of the joint seminar.
The assigned years for this seminar are the second through the fourth year. Sufficient preparation is particularly required for second-year students. In addition, students presenting reports will need to prepare their presentations such that they can be understood by second-year students without the prerequisite level of knowledge. Consideration will be given to students involved in job searching activities. 3rd and 4th grade students are encouraged to participate.
※Please refer to Japanese Page for details including evaluations, textbooks and others.
民法に関するさまざまな問題点を検討しながら，問題の正確な位置づけを把握し，法的な思考に基づいて自分の考えを導くことができるようになることを目指します。それとともに，文献を調べる，グループで発表の準備をし報告をする，報告に基づき討論するといった，学問をする上でも社会に出る上でも必要な技術を習得することを目指します。
The objectives of this seminar are to examine the various problems in Civil Law while accurately understanding the positioning of those problems and to become able to derive your own ideas based on legal thinking. At the same time, this seminar aims to enable students to master the techniques which are required for learning and to become a member of society which include researching the literature, preparing as a group for a presentation and giving a report, and engaging in a debate based on a report.
このゼミでは，AIが民法に与える影響について考えます。
AIに関する近時の技術革新は目を見張るものがあります。このような技術の進展は，法の世界，とりわけ民法の世界にどのような影響を与えるのでしょうか？
たとえば，次のような問題が考えられます。将来，AIが独自の判断能力を獲得するようになり，AI設計者の責任を問うことができなくなるような事態が生じた場合に，AIが引き起こした損害に対する責任をAI自身に負わせることができるでしょうか？仮にできるとしたら，AIに法の世界での主体としての地位を認める必要があります。では，AIは法の世界の主体たりうるのでしょうか？
このようなAIと民法に関連する様々な問いに取り組むのがこのゼミの課題です。
これらの問いに答えるにあたって，まず人格権やプライバシーに関する基本的な判例を学ぶことから始めます。その上で，関連する論文を講読します。
12月にはAI法の専門家であるカナダ・オタワ大学のCéline Castets-Renard（セリーヌ・カステ＝ルナール）教授を招き，2回にわたって授業をしてもらいます（幡野が通訳をします）。
このゼミでは, 毎回2－3名の報告者が該当テーマに関する報告を行い, それに基づいて討論をします (各参加者は, 学期中に1回報告することになります) ｡ また, 報告後の討論の司会をする, つまり論点を提示するのも報告者です (教員が必要に応じて手助けをします) ｡皆さんの自主性を重んじたいと思っています｡ 十分な予習, 積極的な発言が求められます｡
また，このゼミでは，法政大学・大澤彩先生のゼミとの合同ゼミを予定しています。報告の準備に加えて，合同ゼミの作問か解答，いずれかに参加してもらいます。
配当年次は2‐4年となっています｡とりわけ2年生は，十分な予習が求められます。また，報告者は，前提知識がない2年生にも理解ができるように発表の準備をしてもらう必要があります｡ 就職活動についても，できる限り配慮します。3・4年生も積極的にご参加ください。
In this seminar, we will examine the impact of AI on civil law.
Recent technological innovations in AI are remarkable How will these technological advances affect the world of law, especially the world of civil law? In the future, if AI acquires the ability to make decisions on its own and a situation arises in which the responsibility of the AI designer cannot be held, will AI itself be held responsible for the damage caused by AI? If we can, we need to give AI its status as a subject in the legal world. So, can AI be the subject of the legal world?
The task of this seminar is to struggle with various questions related to AI and civil law.
To answer these questions, we begin by studying basic legal precedents regarding privacy. After that, we will read related papers.
In December, we will invite Professor Céline Castets-Renard of the University of Ottawa, Canada, who is an expert in AI law, to give two classes (Hatano will serve as an interpreter).
In this seminar, during each session two or three students will present a report on the relevant topic which will form the basis of discussion (each participant will give one reports during the semester). Moreover, the students giving the report will also present the arguments after the report to lead the discussion (the instructor may assist as needed). The instructor wishes to respect the autonomy of all students. Students are required to sufficiently prepare and actively speak up in discussion.
In addition, this seminar is scheduled to be a joint seminar with Professor Aya Osawa (Hosei University). In addition to preparing a report, you are invited to participate in either the question or the answer of the joint seminar.
The assigned years for this seminar are the second through the fourth year. Sufficient preparation is particularly required for second-year students. In addition, students presenting reports will need to prepare their presentations such that they can be understood by second-year students without the prerequisite level of knowledge. Consideration will be given to students involved in job searching activities. 3rd and 4th grade students are encouraged to participate.
| 1 | ――以下の予定は，皆さんのレポートの内容などを反映させるため，変更の可能性があります―― 概要説明・報告割り当て |
| 2 | 自己決定権の判例――エホバの証人輸血拒絶事件―― 最判平成12・2・29民集54巻2号582頁 憲法判例百選I〔第7版〕23事件 |
| 3 | プライバシー権の判例①――『宴のあと』事件―― 東京地判昭和39・9・28判時385号12頁 メディア判例百選〔第2版〕40事件 |
| 4 | プライバシー権の判例②――講演会参加者リストの漏洩―― 最判平成15・９・12民集57巻8号973頁 憲法判例百選I〔第7版〕・18事件 |
| 5 | 行動ターゲティング広告と消費者のプライバシー・自己決定 |
| 6 | 就職活動におけるAIによる評価予測の使用 |
| 7 | AIと個人情報保護法 |
| 8 | 自動運転車と損害賠償責任 |
| 9 | 合同ゼミ・作問班の検討 |
| 10 | 弁護士による法律実務の紹介 |
| 11 | AIと個人情報：EUとカナダ① |
| 12 | AIと個人情報：EUとカナダ② |
| 13 | 合同ゼミ・解答班の検討 |
| 14 | AIは人たりうるのか？――動物と比較しながら―― |
板書 /Writing on the Board
スライド（パワーポイント等）の使用 /Slides (PowerPoint, etc.)
上記以外の視聴覚教材の使用 /Audiovisual Materials Other than Those Listed Above
個人発表 /Individual Presentations
グループ発表 /Group Presentations
ディスカッション・ディベート /Discussion/Debate
実技・実習・実験 /Practicum/Experiments/Practical Training
学内の教室外施設の利用 /Use of On-Campus Facilities Outside the Classroom
校外実習・フィールドワーク /Field Work
上記いずれも用いない予定 /None of the above
報告者は周到な準備が求められます｡ 報告者でない参加者も, 十分な予習が求められます。
| 種類 (Kind) | 割合 (%) | 基準 (Criteria) |
|---|---|---|
| 平常点 (In-class Points) | 100 |
報告の内容(40%) 出席態度(30%) 発言の内容・積極性(30%) |
| 備考 (Notes) | ||
| その他 (Others) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 開講時に教材を配布します。Canvas LMSやGoogle Driveなども使用します（開講時に指示します）。 |
| No | 著者名 (Author/Editor) | 書籍名 (Title) | 出版社 (Publisher) | 出版年 (Date) | ISBN/ISSN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 山本龍彦編 | AIと憲法 | 日本経済新聞社 | 2018 | |
| 2 | 弥永真生・山田剛志編著 | AI・DX が変える現代社会と法 | 商事法務 | 2021 | |
| 3 | 小塚荘一郎 | AIの時代と法 | 岩波新書 | 2019 | |
| 4 | 弥永真生・宍戸常寿編 | ロボット・AIと法 | 有斐閣 | 2018 | |
| その他 (Others) | |||||
| このゼミで扱う問題をより具体的にイメージしたい方は上記の本も参照してみてください。 | |||||
＜選考方法＞
採用人数：20人
配当年次：2-4年
選考方法：レポート
①題目：自己紹介およびシラバスを見て関心を持ったテーマについて
②字数：1000字程度
演習論文：実施しません。